Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
Date
Msg-id 29159.1390535281@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?

>     http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B59794.3000500@gmail.com

> I think we would have to make Cygwin-specific regression output to
> handle the regression failures, but frankly I am not even sure if they
> are right.

Those regression failures certainly say there is something broken in
the submitter's build, so this needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
I'm not qualified to evaluate the proposed changes, but I wonder why
they're needed given that we have successful cygwin builds in the
buildfarm.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd