Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> writes:
> [slow query]
The bulk of your time seems to be going into this indexscan:
> -> Index Scan using task_scheduler_icustomer_id on task_scheduler ts
(cost=2.03..11.51rows=1 width=51) (actual time=2.785..2.785 rows=0 loops=4161)
> Index Cond: ("outer".customer_id = ts.customer_id)
> Filter: ((get_available_pages(task_id, customer_id) > 0) AND
((get_check_period(task_id,next_check) IS NULL) OR ((date_part('epoch'::text, get_check_period(task_id, next_check)) -
date_part('epoch'::text,(timenow())::timestamp without time zone)) < 3600::double precision)) AND (status <> 1) AND
((((start_time)::timewith time zone < ('now'::text)::time(6) with time zone) AND ((stop_time)::time with time zone >
('now'::text)::time(6)with time zone)) OR ((start_time IS NULL) AND (stop_time IS NULL))) AND (NOT (hashed subplan)))
> SubPlan
> -> Unique (cost=2.02..2.03 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.617..0.631
rows=3loops=1)
> ...
I kinda doubt that the index search itself is that slow --- doubtless
the problem comes from having to evaluate that filter condition on a lot
of rows. How fast are those functions you're calling?
regards, tom lane
