Re: MSVC SSL test failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: MSVC SSL test failure
Date
Msg-id 2911593.1638726645@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to MSVC SSL test failure  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: MSVC SSL test failure
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I am getting this test failure 001_ssltests.pl on my test MSVC system
> when SSL tests are enabled:

>     not ok 110 - certificate authorization fails with revoked client cert with server-side CRL directory: matches

>     #   Failed test 'certificate authorization fails with revoked client cert with server-side CRL directory:
matches'
>     #   at t/001_ssltests.pl line 618.
>     #                   'psql: error: connection to server at "127.0.0.1", port 59491 failed: server closed the
connectionunexpectedly 
>     #       This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>     #       before or while processing the request.
>     # server closed the connection unexpectedly
>     #       This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>     #       before or while processing the request.
>     # server closed the connection unexpectedly
>     #       This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>     #       before or while processing the request.'
>     #     doesn't match '(?^:SSL error: sslv3 alert certificate revoked)'

> There's nothing terribly suspicious in the server log, so I'm not quite
> sure what's going on here.

Hmm .. does enabling log_connections/log_disconnections produce
any useful info?

This looks quite a bit like the sort of failure that commit
6051857fc was meant to forestall.  I wonder whether reverting
that commit changes the results?  You might also try inserting
a shutdown() call, as we'd decided not to do [1].

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1283317.1638213407%40sss.pgh.pa.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: MSVC SSL test failure
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: The "char" type versus non-ASCII characters