Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes:
>> Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
>> nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
>> in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
>> cost us CVS storage forever.
> Um, why not just have someone with local CVSROOT access just rm -f the
> ,v file when the WIN32_DEV branch ceases to be useful?
If we do that, we will lose the change histories from back when those
files were kept in CVS (five or more years ago). Perhaps this is not
important, but I'm hesitant to do it.
regards, tom lane
