Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)
Date
Msg-id 29071.1284600636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-bugs
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> Two small fixes for hstore-new.
> The hstore_compat one is arguable as to what is the best approach; the
> assert that was there was just wrong, but I have been unable after
> considerable searching to find any architectures that would fail the
> check.

[ scratches head... ]  It looks like that ought to be an immediate
core-dump for old data, given an assert-enabled build.  Are you
saying it isn't?  How?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)