Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 29036.1677440400@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-02-26 13:20:00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I hadn't run my buildfarm-compile-warning scraper for a little while,
>> but I just did, and I find that this commit is causing warnings on
>> no fewer than 14 buildfarm animals.  They all look like

> What other animals? If it had been just ayu / clang 4, I'd not be sure it's
> worth doing much here.

ayu
batfish
demoiselle
desmoxytes
dragonet
idiacanthus
mantid
petalura
phycodurus
pogona
wobbegong

Some of those are yours ;-)

Actually there are only 11, because I miscounted before, but
there are new compilers in that group not only old ones.
desmoxytes is gcc 10, for instance.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1