Re: "value" a reserved word - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: "value" a reserved word
Date
Msg-id 29030.1038006335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "value" a reserved word  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> In light of trying to become fully ISO/ANSI compliant (or even savvy ;)
> could we not make a jump at say 7.4 to having the same set of reserved
> keywords as SQL92/SQL99 and be done with it?

I disagree ... especially for SQL99 keywords that we're not even using.

Also, SQL99 keywords that are actually only function names would be
outright more difficult to reserve than not to reserve...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: "value" a reserved word
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Missing file from CVS?