Re: dblink versus long connection strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: dblink versus long connection strings
Date
Msg-id 28963.1290445704@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dblink versus long connection strings  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: dblink versus long connection strings
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/22/2010 11:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps a reasonable compromise is to issue the truncation warnings when
>> an overlength name is being *entered* into the connection table, but not
>> for simple lookups.

> Can't we distinguish a name from a conninfo string by the presence of an 
> = sign?

No, because = isn't disallowed in names ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: format() with embedded to_char() formatter
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)