Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date
Msg-id 28931.1298923350@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...  (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:39 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Spitballing here, but could sqlite be an intermediate, compromise solution?
>> 
>> For a core PostgreSQL component ?!?!?

> Sure, why not?

Because it's fifty times more mechanism than we need here?  We don't
want a SQL interface (not even a lightweight one) and it's unclear that
we ever want the data to go to disk at all.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v17
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...