Re: SIGPIPE handling - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGPIPE handling
Date
Msg-id 28913.1069005187@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGPIPE handling  (Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>)
List pgsql-patches
Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> Is there a reason we don't make use of the MSG_NOSIGNAL flag to
>> send()?  Or is the problem in case of SSL?

> Oh, seems to be a Linux only thing?

That and the SSL problem.  I wouldn't object to implementing it as a
platform-specific optimization if we could get it to handle the SSL
case, but without SSL support I think it's too limited.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: SRA Win32 sync() code
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling