Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
Date
Msg-id 28853.928939702@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] Anyone working on linux Alpha?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Done.  Removed -O2 for linux_alpha and made it -O.  I can not make the
> other changes because that is generated by GNU autoconf.

config.sub and config.guess are not auto-generated.

What we have already done a couple of times is to apply suggested
fixes to our current copies of these files, but to ask the submitter
to send the bug report to the GNU folks as well (autoconf@gnu.org
and bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu) so that it gets into future GNU
releases.  We do not want to maintain a divergent version of these
files.

I think someone remarked a few days ago that they had access to a
more up-to-date version of the config scripts than was present in
the last Autoconf release (2.13).  Maybe we should try to grab the
latest GNU sources of these files?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: chris@tech.com.au
Date:
Subject: BUG in 6.5 - GROUP BY inheritance
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 6.5 beta2 and beta3 problem