=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Matthias_L=FCdtke?= <matthias-luedtke@gmx.de> writes:
> In fact, parsing this SQL dialect would just be the first step, as the
> annotations within the query induce an ordering of the result set.
> So I need this extra information in the query to accomplish the
> subsequent task of sorting the result set in a certain way before the
> result is returned to the client. I'll have to use some hand crafted
> internal data structures to do this sorting.
Seems like you could save a large amount of work if you can express what
you want to do as ORDER BY a user-defined operator.
If you insist on bolting it on as new SQL syntax, changing the parser
will be only the tip of the iceberg --- you'll likely need planner and
executor changes as well. You could get a rough idea of what's involved
in adding a new kind of query clause by looking at the last patch that
did so:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-08/msg00251.php
regards, tom lane
