Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 20.03.2011 09:06, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm wondering why chapter 22 discusses locales (and now collations)
>> before encodings.
> To me, it feels natural to discuss locales and collations first.
OK, I left that alone.
I can't escape the feeling that section 22.2 could do with a complete
rewrite, though --- it seems awkward and full of unnecessary jargon.
In particular I think we could do without the phraseology about
"collation derivations". But I've been staring at it for too long now
to have a good idea what to do instead.
regards, tom lane
