Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Date
Msg-id 28740.1319831607@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, I find that unlikely as well. �But leaving Asserts in place would
>> tell us.

> OK.  Should I go do that, or are you all over it?

Go for it.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade if 'postgres' database is dropped