Re: [HACKERS] Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects
Date
Msg-id 28695.972489045@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-interfaces
Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Perhaps a good long-term solution for this would be to support
> INFORMATION_SCHEMA per SQL92? This requires basic schema support, of course
> :-)

Yes, I think that's the right answer in the long run.  Won't happen for
a release or three though...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: "Tony Simopoulos"
Date:
Subject: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: signals in ODBC?