Re: Allowing GIN array_ops to work on anyarray - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allowing GIN array_ops to work on anyarray
Date
Msg-id 28608.1474896451@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing GIN array_ops to work on anyarray  (Enrique Meneses <emmeneses@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Allowing GIN array_ops to work on anyarray  (Enrique Meneses <emmeneses@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Enrique Meneses <emmeneses@gmail.com> writes:
> I was not sure what "Spec compliant means"... so I did not select as tested or passed. What should I do to validate
thatthis change is "Spec compliant"?
 

It's irrelevant to this patch, AFAICS.  The SQL standard doesn't discuss
indexes at all, much less legislate on which operator classes ought to
exist for GIN indexes.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Enrique Meneses
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing GIN array_ops to work on anyarray
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM's ancillary tasks