Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> It is not a bug - it is feature. PLpgSQL statements doesn't expect a
> expression on some places.
Well, it's not unreasonable to expect that a subscripted datum could
be used. It looks to me like this is a grammar omission and the
executor code would work fine.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs