Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> We would want the end-of-recovery checkpoint to act like it's not in
>> recovery anymore for this purpose, no?
> For the purpose of updating min recovery point, we want it to act like
> it *is* still in recovery.
Well, without a clear explanation of why min recovery point should move
at all, I'm unable to evaluate that statement.
regards, tom lane
