Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date
Msg-id 2847f907-ee82-7a0c-186f-f7e3c80d0cb1@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Pavel,

On 3/25/19 3:50 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> po 25. 3. 2019 v 8:38 odesílatel David Steele <david@pgmasters.net
> <mailto:david@pgmasters.net>> napsal:
> 
>     On 3/10/19 8:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>     >     Here is pragma patch with demo
>     We're still not getting real review for this patch and Andrew seems as
>     skeptical as anyone that this is the right way to go.
> 
>     I'm planning to mark it as rejected at the end of this CF.
> 
> 
> I hope so Andrew will have some time to review this patch

As discussed above, I have marked this patch as rejected.  It appears
that a more general purpose approach is required to get a consensus on
this feature.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take