Re: SIGPIPE handling - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGPIPE handling
Date
Msg-id 28476.1069002282@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGPIPE handling  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SIGPIPE handling  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Is running the rest of the
> application with SIGPIPE <= SIG_IGN a problem?

That is NOT an acceptable thing for a library to do.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SRA Win32 sync() code
Next
From: Manfred Spraul
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling