Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Date
Msg-id 28450.1131817463@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> If we don't like imposing link time constraints, we could require
> people to include:

> #ifdef PG_MAGIC_BLOCK
> PG_MAGIC_BLOCK;
> #endif

I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like
that might be the best solution.  Anyone think it's unreasonable?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Cursor estimated row count