Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Instability in partition_prune test? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Instability in partition_prune test?
Date
Msg-id 28432.1523634988@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Instability in partition_prune test?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Instability in partition_prune test?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems quite silly to be asking for a parallel plan and then insisting
>> it not run in parallel.

> Now that you mention it, this probably decreases coverage for the
> choose_next_subplan_for_worker function.

Yeah, loss of executor code coverage was what concerned me.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Overcoming SELECT ... FOR UPDATE permission restrictions
Next
From: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooling