Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes
Date
Msg-id 28372.1026792101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] CLUSTER not lose indexes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> It would be a lot clearer if relfilenode were replaced by an integer
> version, starting at 0, and the heap files were named "OID_VERSION".

The reason to not do that is that the bufmgr and levels below would now
need to pass around three numbers, not two, to identify physical files.

We already beat this topic to death a year ago, I'm not eager to re-open
it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN