Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id 28370.1479915919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> This would also reduce the amount of data that we need to write to WAL, 
> although I'm not sure the amount is actually a problem. I've seen 
> instances with ~500MB stat files, but those were instances with hundreds 
> of databases, each with many thousands of objects.

Hm, was this before we split up the stats file per-database?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Next
From: Kostiantyn Nemchenko
Date:
Subject: Typo in comment in file analyze.c [master branch]