Re: INOUT parameters in procedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: INOUT parameters in procedures
Date
Msg-id 28322.1521148906@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INOUT parameters in procedures  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Not fixed by 8df5a1c868cc28f89ac6221cff8e2b5c952d0eb6?

> I think you meant to type "now fixed by".  (unless your compiler is pickier
> than mine)

Actually what I meant was "doesn't that commit fix it for you?"

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: missing support of named convention for procedures
Next
From: Jeremy Finzel
Date:
Subject: Re: worker_spi.naptime in worker_spi example