Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hmm. �I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to get rid of the range
>> checks in BufferIsValid, or better convert them into Asserts. �It seems
>> less than intuitive that BufferIsValid and BufferIsInvalid aren't simple
>> inverses.
> Seems reasonable. It would break if anyone is using an out-of-range
> buffer number in lieu of InvalidBuffer, but I doubt that anyone is.
Yeah, I find that unlikely as well. But leaving Asserts in place would
tell us.
regards, tom lane
