Re: Passing arguments to views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Passing arguments to views
Date
Msg-id 28187.1138993110@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Passing arguments to views  (Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com>)
Responses Re: Passing arguments to views
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com> writes:
> If we are talking about inserting the function definition into the
> query as a subquery and then letting the parser treat it as a
> subquery, then I see no reason to use either the existing function or
> view subsystems.  It sounds more like we are discussing a macro
> language.

Which is pretty much what a SQL function is already.  I don't see a need
to invent a separate concept.  To the extent that macros have different
semantics than functions (eg, multiple evaluation of arguments) the
differences are generally not improvements IMHO ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Passing arguments to views