Re: SIGTTIN / SIGTTOU handling (was Re: BUG #15449) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2018-Nov-17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the lack of complaints, there's probably no need for back-patch,
>> but that's what I'd propose in HEAD to make this saner.

> Hmm, but the bug was reported on pg10 ... why wouldn't we backpatch this
> fix there?

The complaint was about SIGPIPE handling (or lack of it).  I do intend
to back-patch the fix for that.  This is just a side issue that came
up in that thread.

            regards, tom lane