Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes()
Date
Msg-id 28156.1446927440@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> The question is, do we want to still change it? It's a new function in 
>> 9.5, and we're just about to enter beta, so I guess we could, although 
>> there might already be applications out there using it. If we do want to 
>> rename it, now is the last chance to do it.

> +0.5 or so to changing it.  But if we do, it has to happen before Monday.

Are we doing this (seems like nobody objected), and if so who's going to
make it happen?  Time grows short.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lars Kanis
Date:
Subject: Re: Better name for PQsslAttributes()
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to print the raw_parse_tree in the Log file