Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I see for the CONNX driver code that handles signal masking:
Aren't these functions in themselves totally thread-unsafe?
That wouldn't matter in a non-thread-based implementation, but if you
are going to rely on a second thread to handle signal processing, all
of the code that manipulates the private state of the signal emulation
had better be thread-safe.
regards, tom lane
