Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/?
Date
Msg-id 2811067.1783642452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> writes:
> Does "backpatching the new macro" mean we'd also adjust all existing
> places to use the new macro or not? I mean, we could backpatch just the
> bit in c.h. I plan to adjust the places, to minimize possible conflicts
> when backpatching other stuff.

I think it'd be sufficient to add the new macro to the old branches.
The point of back-patching at all, I think, is to save ourselves
work if we have to back-patch some new code that uses the new style.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC: VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_NOACCESS for dynamic shared memory
Next
From: Ewan Young
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix duplicate detection for null-treatment window functions