Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN
Date
Msg-id 2811003.1598444329@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN
List pgsql-hackers
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> writes:
> At Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:03:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote in
>> I can confirm that this two-month old email report still produces
>> different results with indexes on/off in git master, which I don't think
>> is ever correct behavior.

> I agree to that the behavior is broken.

Yeah, but ... what is "non broken" in this case?  I'm not convinced
that having point_inside() return zero for any case involving NaN
is going to lead to noticeably saner behavior than today.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: More tests with USING INDEX replident and dropped indexes
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Move OpenSSL random under USE_OPENSSL_RANDOM