Re: reducing isolation tests runtime - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: reducing isolation tests runtime
Date
Msg-id 28069.1543956339@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing isolation tests runtime  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: reducing isolation tests runtime
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I'd like to see this revived, getting a bit tired waiting longer and
> longer to see isolationtester complete.  Is it really a problem that we
> require a certain number of connections? Something on the order of 30-50
> connections ought not to be a real problem for realistic machines, and
> if it's a problem for one, they can use a serialized schedule?

The longstanding convention in the main regression tests is 20 max.
Is there a reason to be different here?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing isolation tests runtime