Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs
Date
Msg-id 28031.1310069201@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On tor, 2011-07-07 at 13:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, so the plan is to move these settings into a separate top-level
>> group "Replication", and sub-divide into master and standby settings,

> Most of the messages use the term "primary" rather than "master".  I
> think there was a discussion in 9.0 in favor of that term.

Well, there seems to be a lot more usage of the term "master" than
the other in the docs ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: excessive backpatching of gitignore files
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: spurious use of %m format in pg_upgrade