Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD
Date
Msg-id 27c94b85d966351e2715cdbf79cb4c658b3cfaa7.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 14:36 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Do we have general agreement on this point? Did I miss another
> purpose
> of detoasting in tablecmds.c, or can we just remove that part of the
> patch?

Per discussion with Justin, I'll drive this patch. I merged the CF
entries into https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3110/

New version attached, with the detoasting code removed. Could use
another round of validation/cleanup in case I missed something during
the merge.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Unused function parameter in get_qual_from_partbound()
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic