Re: replacements for vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: replacements for vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 27999.1103346836@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replacements for vacuum?  (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: replacements for vacuum?  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-general
Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> writes:
> I'd like to be able to run vacuum in a 'test' or read-only mode where
> i'd see what it would do before actually running it.

Er ... what possible value would that have?  ISTM it would expend 80% of
the effort to achieve 0% of the result.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: OSX 10.3.7 broke Postgresql 8.0.0b5?
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Scheduler in Postgres