Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types
Date
Msg-id 27967.1518545582@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Converting plpgsql to use DTYPE_REC for named composite types  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2017-12-30 0:16 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>>> I'll stick this into the January commitfest, but I'd like to get it
>>> reviewed and committed pretty soon, because there are follow-on patches
>>> that need to get done in time for v11 --- in particular, we need to close
>>> out the lack of plpgsql support for domains-over-composite.

> all test passed on my comp too.

Is anyone planning on doing further review of this patch than Pavel
already did?  If not, I'd like to go ahead and push it, since there's
still followup stuff that I'd like to address for v11.  As noted upthread,
there are places where plpgsql fails to enforce DOMAIN NOT NULL
constraints, and I think I had some other squishy things in my notes.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vladimir Sitnikov
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC Idea Discussion] "Thrift datatype support" Project
Next
From: Bear Giles
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC Idea Discussion] "Thrift datatype support" Project