Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters
Date
Msg-id 27958.1114491152@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-general
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:05:57PM -0500, Tony Caduto wrote:
>> Is the syntax going to be exactly like it is in Oracle?

> I'm not familiar with the Oracle syntax and I don't know how close
> the PostgreSQL implementation is to being final, but here's an
> example that works with the most recent code from HEAD (8.1devel):

> CREATE FUNCTION foo(IN x integer, INOUT y integer, OUT z integer) AS $$

FWIW, we will also take the more Oracle-ish spelling of the parameter
list:

CREATE FUNCTION foo(x IN integer, y IN OUT integer, z OUT integer) AS ...

... although given all the other in-detail discrepancies between plpgsql
and Oracle's pl/sql, I'm not sure how much this will really make
anyone's life easier.  In any case, Michael's example is the preferred
syntax because it is what the SQL spec calls for.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Dinesh Pandey"
Date:
Subject: Postgres source (tar file) for Fedora Core OS?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: I can't create a new database with GB18030 encoding