Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 03:16:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't the issue here the interaction between log_transaction_sample_rate
>> and log_min_duration_statement?
> No, that interaction only affects statement-level sampling.
OK, I was confusing the features.
> For transaction-level sampling we do the sampling independently of the
> statement duration, i.e. we when starting a transaction we determine
> whether the whole transaction will be sampled. It has nothing to do with
> the proposed log_statement_sample_limit.
So, to clarify: our plan is that a given statement will be logged
if any of these various partial-logging features says to do so?
(And the knock on HEAD's behavior is exactly that it breaks that
independence for log_min_duration_statement.)
regards, tom lane
