Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Date
Msg-id 27949.1519768101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT  (Jonathan Allen <jallen@americansavingslife.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
I wrote:
> I'm afraid to push this in today, because today is a release wrap day,
> and there's no time to recover if it turns out that we tickle some
> portability issue.  But I think we should fix it as soon as the release
> dust settles.

Pushed now.  Barring buildfarm complaints, it'll be in our May releases.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgAdmin Development Team || pgAdmin (PostgreSQL Management tool)4 ||Version 2.0 || EULA questionnaire
Next
From: Jonathan Allen
Date:
Subject: RE: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT