Re: Proving IS NOT NULL inference for ScalarArrayOpExpr's - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proving IS NOT NULL inference for ScalarArrayOpExpr's
Date
Msg-id 27930.1547485471@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proving IS NOT NULL inference for ScalarArrayOpExpr's  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> writes:
> Are those invariants we want to keep (and recognize as regression
> tests)? If so, I can confirm that they aren't duplicative of the rest
> of the file, and if not I can remove them.

I can't get terribly excited about them ... if we were changing their
behavior, or if there were a bug discovered here, then I'd think
differently.  But I'm not a fan of adding regression test cycles
without a reason.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Proving IS NOT NULL inference for ScalarArrayOpExpr's
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE SQL statement for PG12