Re: leakproof - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: leakproof
Date
Msg-id 27924.1329953437@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: leakproof  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: leakproof  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: leakproof  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/22/2012 04:29 PM, Marc Munro wrote:
>> As the developer of veil I feel marginally qualified to bikeshed here:
>> how about "silent"?  A silent function being one that will not blab.

> I also made this suggestion later in the day.

SILENT isn't a bad idea.  It seems to lead the mind in the right
direction, or at least not encourage people to guess the wrong meaning.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC