Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests
Date
Msg-id 2790908.1632782971@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On Sep 27, 2021, at 1:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a little inclined to re-enable the test without your other
>> changes, just to see what happens.

> That sounds like a good idea.  Even if it passes at first, I'd prefer to leave it for a week or more to have a better
senseof how stable it is.  Applying my patches too soon would just add more variables to a not-so-well understood
situation.

Done.  I shall retire to a safe viewing distance and observe the
buildfarm.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Couldn't we mark enum_in() as immutable?
Next
From: Rachel Heaton
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Print error when libpq-refs-stamp fails