Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()
Date
Msg-id 27833.1590414733@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> Comments or objections?

> Seeing none ... I intend to backpatch and push these two patches in the next day
> or so.

There was some question as to what (if anything) to do with the Windows
version of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS.  Have you resolved that?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: repeat() function, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), and unlikely()