Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Date
Msg-id 2780.1285192996@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I mean, it took us forever to require Perl 5.8.

... and we still make a point of not having a hard requirement for
that.  If you don't want plperl, you can build from a tarball with
no perl at all.

Given the project history, I can't see us turning a dependency
we just added this week into a hard requirement anytime soon.

Now having said that, if you define "supported platform" to mean
"gets tested on the buildfarm", we do require Perl.  And CVS,
which will soon get replaced by a requirement for Git.  But I'm
not going to tell someone to get lost if they file a portability
bug report without having set up a buildfarm animal first.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Git conversion status