Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Lock partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Lock partitions
Date
Msg-id 27780.1161190066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lock partitions  (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>)
Responses Re: Lock partitions  (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes:
> The number of transaction errors increased when I increased the 
> NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS, which I think is the reason it failed to run when I 
> set it to 16.

Hmm, what sort of errors are we talking about?  I wonder if you've
exposed a bug.  Changing NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS really shouldn't have any
semantic effect.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jie Zhang"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index status
Next
From: Mark Wong
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock partitions