Re: FK type mismatches? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FK type mismatches?
Date
Msg-id 27748.1062805724@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FK type mismatches?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Robert Treat writes:
>> In all this discussion of NOTICE vs. WARNING, can someone remind me the
>> logic for INFO?  I can't seem to recall the differentiator there either.

> Info is something you request explicitly.  In the past, the result for
> EXPLAIN and SHOW were sent as INFO, but now those are sent as query
> results, and there are in fact very few INFO instances left.  Also, INFO
> is not affect by the log level settings.

In a severity sense I think INFO is identical to NOTICE.  We invented
the category as a means of preserving the pre-existing behavior of
VACUUM VERBOSE (ie, always show the messages) when we added
client_min_messages configurability.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Examining the output of: ldd `which postgres`
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Notices for redundant operations