Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia
Date
Msg-id 27684.1466213813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-committers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Was this supposed to fix the "ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in
>> targetlist" problem?
>> If so, it hasn't ...

> Can you please share why you think so?

Run the regression tests with the settings mentioned in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/22782.1466100870@sss.pgh.pa.us

You'll get a lot of cosmetic diffs (parallelized plans in EXPLAIN
and/or varying output row orders), but also half a dozen of the
aforesaid failure.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix handling of argument and result datatypes for partial aggreg