Re: Posix Shared Mem patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date
Msg-id 27649.1340993669@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>>> 10% isn't assuming dedicated.

>> Really?

> Yes.  As I said, the allocation for dedicated PostgreSQL servers is
> usually 20% to 25%, up to 8GB.

Any percentage is assuming dedicated, IMO.  25% might be the more common
number, but you're still assuming that you can have your pick of the
machine's resources.

My idea of "not dedicated" is "I can launch a dozen postmasters on this
machine, and other services too, and it'll be okay as long as they're
not doing too much".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux