Re: Seqscan rather than Index

From: Tom Lane
Subject: Re: Seqscan rather than Index
Date: ,
Msg-id: 27633.1103344657@sss.pgh.pa.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Frank Wiles)
Responses: Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Frank Wiles)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

Seqscan rather than Index  (Jon Anderson, )
 Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (David Brown, )
  Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Richard Huxton, )
   Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Greg Stark, )
    Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Tom Lane, )
     Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Greg Stark, )
      Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Seqscan rather than Index  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )
     Re: Seqscan rather than Index  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )
      Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Frank Wiles, )
       Re: Seqscan rather than Index  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )
       Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Tom Lane, )
        Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Frank Wiles, )
     Re: Seqscan rather than Index  (Bruno Wolff III, )
      Re: Seqscan rather than Index  ("Steinar H. Gunderson", )

Frank Wiles <> writes:
>   I've also seen a huge difference between select count(*) and
>   select count(1) in older versions,

That must have been before my time, ie, pre-6.4 or so.  There is
certainly zero difference now.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

From: Stan Y
Date:
Subject: Monitor CPU time per transaction?
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Seqscan rather than Index